![]() 11, 2022: The Request for Comment (RFC) to deploy Uniswap v3 on BNB was posted in the Uniswap governance forum. Timeframe and Context on Bridge Selection Temperature Check Delegates, as always, will have the opportunity to vote for or against the proposal in this final vote, based on their view of which choice is best for Uniswap.The proposal to deploy Uniswap v3 on BNB Chain will go forward to the final governance vote with Wormhole as the selected bridge. In other words, no votes voiced outside of the Snapshot poll will be counted in the results. ![]() The final Governance vote will move forward with the results of the most recent Snapshot Poll.Following the community discussion on this proposal over the past week, the UF is posting here to answer some open questions and draw attention to next steps. ![]() ![]() Im looking forward to more forthcoming research / commentary on this topic.ĭisclaimer: Variant is an investor in the UNI tokens. My view stands that the best outcome is for new chain dapp deployments to be bridge agnostic, and to embrace modular standards that foster more competition. There’s already good discussion emerging around multi-bridge deployment designs, as well as the merits of individual bridges. Encourage folks to follow and contribute to the new Cross-Chain Bridge Assessment discussion as a first step there. Was it forward progress? Yes, and I am glad to see that.Įven more importantly this Snapshot highlighted the need for more bridging research - both on existing solutions for future deployments, and so that a single bridge selection doesn’t need to be bundled to new deployments going forward (for example, as Martin proposes here.) That this came up as a result of this Snapshot is a win in my eyes.Ĭoming on the back of this Snapshot, the focus moving forward is on improving the cross-chain deployment process from first principles. The discussion around the merits of each bridge being considered here was absolutely better than leaving that discussion unconsidered at all. Action begets action, and continued forward movement is critical in decentralized governance. Process-wise, the Uniswap Foundation holding a temperature check on which bridge to use in the BSC deployment served both to generally highlight the issue of bridge selection in cross-chain deployment, and advance the decision in this particular instance. I also wanted to more explicitly commend Devin and UF for their work in stewarding the process here and on other issues, which in sum, has resulted in a lot more momentum in community governance. I want to take the opportunity to expand and point to areas for development where I’m excited to see progress. On Monday, I posted a few thoughts which amounted to my decision to abstain from a voting on which bridge Uniswap should use in its deployment of v3 to BNB.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |